Talk:Rapid Fire 20

Should the history of the blaster be separated off from the description of the article? it would make it much better.

Nerfmaster8 16:43, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * It would be awkward to do so, considering no other articles have or really need a history section. JetCell  [ Talk • Contributions ] 17:28, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

actually the Titan AS.V.1, Hornet AS-6 and Rapid Fire AS-20 need a history section. it may not seem like/worth a lot but will be useful. When i go to bulbapedia, all the information is neaty organized and sectioned off.

i don't like comparing this wiki to bulbapedia, but based on current progress; i don't think we are realy getting anywhere. the warning should be on the top of each page-community messages. This will make them more effective because people will actually see them. modification sections should be well written, otherwise we shouldn't have one on the articles. "this blaster is disliked in the modding community due to the reverse plunger", what good is that shoved in the details sections? This makes me want to delete it.

Nerfmaster8 22:49, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Just because three pages need a history section does not mean that a history section should be implemented into article layouts.


 * As for the "disliked in the modding community" part, I do agree with you partially. If anything, it should just be re-worded, since it does provide information to the viewer. JetCell  [ Talk • Contributions ] 00:26, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Discontinued?
Is this product discontinued? There is a discontinued tag, but it says it can still be found in Toys 'R' Us in the history/description.

REALNerfNinja6 (talk) 20:54, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

i have been meaning to get jet to update the template with parameters but any ways, these are out of production. that doesn't mean that stores don't have any stock left to sell in warehouses... Nerfmaster8 (talk) 21:07, March 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Is there really a need to compile all of the discontinued templates into one single one? I really don't think it's necessary. I've changed the template to reflect it still having limited stock. Jet  [ Talk • Contributions ] 22:19, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

makes it easier to tag a template when there is only one rather than multiple for each new situation. would you rather have a new template for each situation or a simple 2 parameter + default as one template? i prefer the latter and it also makes it easier on everyone else. Nerfmaster8 (talk) 22:28, March 29, 2013 (UTC)