Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-33018139-20191106041954/@comment-33092097-20191106171210

Joseph Brainard wrote: We all have a blaster we hate, but some are not what they seem. For example, the Longstrike was advertised for long-range combat, but it has a reverse plunger and only fires up to 30 feet. Compare it to the Longshot, which had the longest range at the time before the Nitron was released. The Ravyen was also a scam because it looked like an automatic blaster, but it was semi-automatic, so it wasn't that fast. The same thing with the Demolisher and Revoltinator, but the worst motorized scam was with the ONE. The Mastodon was automatic, why couldn't they make the ONE automatic? The Battlescout was the worst of them all, as the camera is cheaper than it seems, and the Battlecamo version doesn't fix it(But at least they removed the camera)! Okay, First of all, the new longstrike is direct plunger, and shoots further than the longshot. longshots are discontinued, it is 70 dollars because of the amout of attachments and stuff it comes with and because $NIPER!!! looking like an automatic doesnt take away from the box saying semi-auto. the ONE is more of a test than anything in itś current state, nerf is making a cheaper ultra blaster to hype up ultra for the new big (auto) stuff. The battlescout is in fact garbage, the camera is however the best Nerf camera but not a good camera at that, the battlecamo does fix the performance substantally and they removed the camera and cut the cost. sorry to debunk everything you said but it had to be done.