User blog comment:JetCell/New reviewing templates (guidelines to come)/@comment-5065259-20120913035311

wish we had direct reply, starting new chain

if people want the capacity they read the article not the review. for reliability, we could combine the ginimicks into reliability though.

year would not be useful but to distingush then maybe series, though i doubt that will be necessary. if the title can be linked to the actual article it would solve this problem of year and series.

my plan for accuracy is to set up a target at average human height and fire like full (packaged) clip of darts. After wards look at how many actually hit the target. the target would also be set up at a set distance away every time. accuracy isn't tested now a days probably because they don't know how to test that.