Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-9548289-20140517015027/@comment-9548289-20140517020637

Okay, now for my comparison. I'll be judging Ergonomics, Ranges, Accuracy, ROF, and Reliability. Okay. Ergonomics: Both blasters (Stryfe and EAT) are very comfortable to use, the EAT's pump action is smooth, the Stryfe's trigger is also not as rough as the Rayven's trigger. Since both of these blasters are comfortable, it's a tie.

The Score is 0-0.

Range: My Stryfe gets good ranges with normal AA Batteries, around 40-60 feet flat and 75 feet + Angled. My friends EAT (Which the EAT I'm using) gets bad ranges for an Elite Blaster, around 30-45 feet flat and 60 feet angled. The Stryfe wins.

The score is 1-0.

Accuracy: Both blasters are accurate, although not accurate as LongShots and Retals. The Stryfe however, can be quite Sporadic being a flywheel. So the EAT wins.

The score is 1-1.

Rate of Fire: Both blasters have fast RoF, being semi-auto, both blasters can reach beyond 5 DPS, the difference is that with the Stryfe, it's easier to reach 5 DPS. The Stryfe wins.

The score is 2-1.

Usability: Both blasters can jam due to using bad darts or user error, though both don't jam as bas as the raider. The EAT can jam when Slam-firing, the Stryfe can also misfire. EAT jams are equal to Stryfe jams/misfires, but the Stryfe needs batteries and revving up, so the EAT wins.

Overall, both blasters are awesome, the Stryfe is better in Range and ROF, while the EAT is more accurate and more reliable.