Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-1585211-20131207142428/@comment-23891957-20131222134923

Nerfmaster8 wrote: Throws-Many-Darts wrote: NM, I'm really getting sick of your crap.

First off, a 5-2-5 is not in support of either side, whether or not you want it to be. Those extra 2 could go for either side they so please and we could still be in a draw over it until someone who hasn't answered takes a definite side. Even if it's RNN, god forbid this lasts long enough for him to come back and answer to it. GG's doing the right thing building up the off-brand during this. you are wrong on the vote, a few new users have not bothered to post on this. so far its 5-1-5 with 2 opposing giving easily refutatable claims. keep in mind that was way before the recent change in tone, please look at the dates before accusing something baseless. 4080381 and The_Stig_3136 haven't bothered posting even though multiple communication methods were left. So what you're saying here is that you actually tried to invalidate people's votes over something so small as an "easily refutable claim"?

Oh ho ho. Nope. I'm through talking. No split is my view, and it will stay that way. Good day.