Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-5578690-20140527011025/@comment-5578690-20140531044521

GameGear360 wrote:

Excuse me? Due to personal opinion? If you want my honest opinion, then you can have it. None of them are flaws. The flaws are your ideas.

The RotoTrack is a Mega Blitz blaster because we have proof of it being one; the advertisement directly from Hasbro. We have an official, accurate source. There is no reason to remove it, none. Case closed; it's not personal opinion, we have the proof in the pictures. No one has ever disputed it being a Mega Blitz blaster because, while the box has never surfaced, that ad has.

The reason why 1998 has two different boxes is because that's when the division that ran Nerf changed. Early 98 blasters had green packaging, while late 98 blasters had yellow packaging. This continued until 2001, when blasters began to have green packaging yet again. This is why there are two different colours; it's not a matter of opinion.

i have asked around in particular, AFON have no idea of it being mega blitz. even though jet said both ads and boxes are useful, the point here is you are not listening at all.


 * 1) nerfcenter review only lists cyber styke gear/new, tell me what does "new" stand for here?
 * 2) dart strike while is lacking in content excludes both triple torch and rototrack from mega blitz
 * 3) your proof consists of one advertisement compared to other sources that say otherwise. that's one source against 2 distingushed sources!
 * 4) from your information, you say that early 1998 boxes were by Larami and later boxes were by Hasbro; is that correct? I still have yet to find proof of that claim. i see only the ripchord box is the green theme and a youtube review of the rototrack box as the yellow theme; no further proof beyond that.

GameGear360 wrote: The Rattler/Eagle Eye are not Cyber Stryke Gear blasters nor were they ever. I used them as an example of blasters that continued on that were re-released in the 1998 packaging, and nothing more. I did not suggest they joined another theme because they did not. my mistake and apologies, i meant max force. i never said you suggested they joined another theme. my point there is that blasters get a new box each year depending on if they are still sold and if the company

GameGear360 wrote: This isn't about one person's viewpoint? Why do you make it seem like I am the only person who disagrees to this? You do realize you're the only person to have these sorts of ideas?

You started this discussion to talk about an idea that I had several months ago, not to talk about the RotoTrack and vintage series. Please stop looking down at Jet and I, we try to make this wiki as best as possible.

As I said earlier, until I can find conclusive evidence for anything you mentioned, it will not be added nor will it be changed. You have not offered conclusive proof. i never said you disagree and i don't see anyone else against, you said yourself the information is against your personal viewpoint and now when i challenge that you become defensive. so besides vintage, exactly what would an improvement drive be over? we have everything on the common vintage as well as n-strike until present. your personal viewpoint ran counter to what jet said earlier of anything new would be good to add. i casted doubt by providing sources that backed up my claim, you are trying to counter the doubt that i brought up with a single source. now i can ask a friend to check if the ultimate book timeline has the re-release information, i already asked if the canceled stuff was - there is no canceled blaster information.


 * note that I already provided proof over Nerf Action not existing in which 2 ads can be used to prove it. there is one that includes known original blasters with the "ACTION" logo, another 2 that have the claimed blasters under the "ACTION" series and a final ad that has "action" with a red glow on a cyber stryke gear ad. that's enough evidence to prove otherwise. like i said before and since you guys don't wish to believe me then don't change it. the ads are on this wiki already, look it up on your own.
 * EDIT: i see 5 of the total cyber stryke gear boxes having that red glowing "action" logo. Does that prove something?

who said i am looking down at either of you? i'm here trying to check the information is accurate and find flaws plus try and fix those yet for the second time you stand by your advertisement.

i'm not going to continue this if you want to drag this out into a war discussion since nobody is that interested in any of the information provided. what was i thinking?