Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-1585211-20130909030111/@comment-5578690-20130912030609

GameGear360 wrote: Nerf Blaster Wiki has shown that it could probably stay active due to the high amount of articles and other things such as more lax rules on reviewing, leaks, and whatnot. I do not mind having one wiki alongside us.

I do believe, though, that Nerf Exclusive wiki is unnecessary and consists of everything we already have here, albeit in smaller quantities. Threatening you'll shut down the thread will not do you any good, as that will only result in it being re-instated. We need to make a decision for our community.

Also, how would you know about the Buzz Bee Wiki, DM8? It hasn't been edited months/years, and I wasn't even aware of its existence until now. that's true that nerfipedia can stay a float for the time being. never said i was going to shut down this thread unless RNN6 decides to imposter me again (first time was removed already). impostering is possible due to the current reply system of quoting in which the quote CAN actually be changed. formal complaint has been sent in to address this loophole.

like nerfmaster8 said, it depends on what style: community or official. it doesn't seem like having off brand on nerf wiki is productive, its best to move it back to nerfipedia and rein in the bureacrats who are misbehaving though a rename would be wise.

in addition i don't think that we can request for those wikis to be shut down immediately, we need to get a discussion going with those wiki constributors on the "inactive" wikis and convince them to merge over otherwise wikia staff won't agree to it.

the current mixing of community view points and official view points doesn't work at all on this wiki. perhaps that is due to the fact that no definition has been set on controversial topics. lanard toys: http://thecorpsbylanard.wikia.com/wiki/The_Corps!_by_lanard_Wikibuzz bee toys: http://buzzbee.wikia.com/wiki/Buzz_Bee_Toys_Wiki