Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-1585211-20140320181749/@comment-1585211-20140327031541

I'm not sure what you're implying or why modern Nerf was brought up, but I can tell that was putting this wiki in a rather negative spotlight. Honestly, if you find errors, then why not help fix them, or add new info? Instead, we're just left knowing we have errors on both modern and vintage blasters, although we don't know where or how as they haven't been described.

I would like to see a better way to set up a database. The other databases, NerfHQ Wiki/NerfHaven Wiki, Studio Yale Database, and the inactive ones, all do not offer the same level of info as the Nerf Wiki does. We also offer over 1000 pages, and out of all 1000 pages, only two pages are in the stub-class (less than 500 bytes). That's impressive for any wiki, let alone a toy wiki. This is not a case of quantity over quality.

As of right now, unless you can show me your progress on DBE 2.0, I don't think there's a better database than the Nerf Wiki. My opinion may change, however as I have yet to see it, I can't back up your statement.

This was not meant in a negative tone.