Board Thread:Rumor discussion/@comment-38565009-20200615015308/@comment-27306930-20200709234621

Thinkbui wrote: Would there be any harm in starting articles on Elite 2.0 with what we know now and then add info on the darts as it comes to light? ... it is getting kind of annoying looking in a dozen different places when it could be consolidated into one location. This wiki has always been one of the few places in the NIC where facts, fiction, and fantasy aren't co-mingled to the point where it's difficult to sort them out. This has required a lot of perseverance, peer review, and effort by our contributors, members, and mods. With the exception of the forum where we foster speculation (and label it as such), nerfers have always known they can come here to get the truth.

In my opinion, the problem with creating articles about blasters that haven't been released and have little to no official information, is there's not much to print once you weed out all the speculation. We saw this recently when we speculated about the Flyte. The next thing we knew, other sites were quoting our speculation as published facts, and posting photoshops as leaked pics.

So no, don't speculate about Elite 2.0 in the articles. Don't publish two facts and call it an article. Don't embellish. And if all you can say in the Nerf Elite 2.0 Turbine article is it's a proposed blaster that shoots darts, then that's not an article. Leave that stuff on the forum.