User blog comment:JetCell/New reviewing templates (guidelines to come)/@comment-5065259-20120912233531/@comment-2234967-20120913020106

Rating gimmicks and execution may be considered opinion however. Sure, some things are fact (ie: the Gator is awful because of its gimmick), but other things, usually that have to do with more modern blasters, come down to personal opinion. I still see people defend the Deploy and say that they like it.

Even then, something like that can be noticed in reliability, since that category deals with physical performance of a blaster. Often enough gimmicks get in the way of this.

Perhaps instead of having year and series, we could put something else that actually helps with the review. Maybe this is where we could list features and/or gimmicks.

Like I said, capacity is a bit of a crucial part of what blasters people buy. I'd be for removing capacity if we could think of a way to still keep it a part of the review in some form.