User blog:JetCell/New reviewing templates (guidelines to come)

I have created two new templates that will replace the current reviewing system. This includes a full review template, which will be located solely on sub-articles, as well as a smaller, summarized template which will be located on actual articles. Sub-articles will be locked in lieu of people abusing edits and inserting false or biased information.

As you may have noticed, I removed accuracy from the score categories. I think that accuracy could easily be merged with the reliability category. If you think otherwise and want to keep accuracy, let me know.

This means that scores will now be out of four categories, which means that scores will no longer look like 8.8, but more like 8.75.

With these new templates, there will also be new guidelines for reviewing. I am switching guidelines from size of blaster to type of blaster and how they are powered. Types will include air-powered, electronic, torsion spring, etc. I'm not sure how to categorize some blasters, mainly plunger blasters. Would it be a good idea to have two categories for reverse and direct plungers?

This is all in the works and nothing is completely permanent just yet. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or ideas on how to make this review portion of the site more fair and professional.