Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-1585211-20131207142428/@comment-2234967-20131210003303

Nerfmaster8 wrote: Since some users are confused; this discussion involves NBW and DBE, not NEW and definitely does NOT INVOLVE Nerf Wiki! splitting in the end wouldn't change much since NBW has as accurate information as you can get so far considering its the only one with useful content regarding off-brand. Nerf has errors, no idea where Jet got the information from regarding BBT - AB/AW is a mess. Those those that would suggest Nerf Wiki being closed, I don't know what to tell you; that doesn't have a snowball's chance. NEW is essentially a minor fork of Nerf Wiki, don't bother wasting our time suggesting that be a location; It doesn't involve Off-Brand and should not even be considered as a candidate. Those that suggest either NBW or DBE be closed, please provide valid points - you can reference GG's detailed review; don't just say it without anything to back it up with. that is unhelpful, increases deadlock time and may hurt feelings both ways. GG's review seems fair towards both and notes flaws/strengths of each wiki, the thing that the community needs to figure out is which is a more suitable location for a split if that is decided.

If we have to split, I'd actually suggest putting off-brand content on the Dart blaster Wiki. A name change could be requested to fix the uncapitalized "blaster" in the name. Having off-brand content be on Nerf Blaster Wiki wouldn't make sense, as its name clearly states "Nerf Blaster". As for DBE, the name/url is long and awkward; something simple like "Dart Blaster" shows clearly what the wiki disusses and is easy for people to get to.

Nerfmaster8 wrote: Since the split is in dead lock

I wouldn't consider it being in dead lock until there are more people supporting the split than being neutral/opposing it. This is what I was talking about above with no one member's choice is the final choice; you're acting like your stance is the one and only. Keep in mind that you're not staff here. The idea to promote you was just that: an idea. I understand that you want to get this idea underway, and that's great, but you're pushing it too fast and not letting any discussion happen.