Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-1585211-20160721020948/@comment-27923854-20160721205601

What if you rate it for how good it was in context of other blasters of the same time period, and for how it compares now, and for mod potential, rarity, or any other factors that affect whether or not someone would buy one.

Also, weren't we going to make performance pages instead of reveiws? So they would just show how they work. It could be open for anyone to edit, with a warning that vandalism and innaccurate info will be punished. It would be strictly for how the blaster performs, such as range, angled and flat, reliability, and maybe accuracy? I think that would work nicely, and if there is a real problem with innaccurate info or vandalism, which I dont thing there will be, you could lock them.