Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-24548292-20140214212955/@comment-23891957-20140622182725

Pedroh1999 wrote: Oasengenggam, you have your opinion- and I think you are my best friend here, Indonesia Boy :3- and I don't like Rayven too. But try to respect the Rampage11 opinion, the Rayven was a great idea- a sucessor for Firefly. Also, I am with you- the Jolt is much better. It don't jam and don't need batteries. Those aren't as much of a pro when they're just inherent of the blaster design- the same could be said of any EX/IX blaster, like the Nite Finder or the Scout.

Also, the Jolt and Rayven are not comparable. At all. The only things the Jolt and Rayven have in common are construction materials, barrel width, and the company that made them.

Otherwise, they work differently on every level. Trigger mech, method of propulsion, construction methods, barrel length, loading mechanism, configuration (bullpup SMG vs derringer), size class, common use (Rayven primary/secondary, Jolt tertiary/backup), mod receptiveness, color, included darts, accessory receptiveness, sights... All of those differ between the two. There's probably more that I'm missing.