User blog comment:JetCell/New reviewing templates (guidelines to come)/@comment-5065259-20120912233531/@comment-2234967-20120913000932

Personally I see them being the same but I can understand why accuracy and reliability should be split. Only problem is that it's hard to gauge accuracy and often enough reviews of modern blasters do not even take it in account.

As I've said in the past, I do not want to compare toy guns to real guns. This is why I prefer the idea of splitting them into categories based on how they are fired/powered. In fact, if I can recall, you were the one you may have suggested this idea in the first place.

As for the review system Gage presented in your link, I'd rather hear word back from Gage about that. If he would like us to implement things from that, then we can discuss it. As it stands right now, everything below the capacity category in his suggestion is not entirely useful and is generally discussed in the bulk of the original review. I can see maybe size being worth mentioned, but that's really it.