Talk:Micro Blaster

Reviews
As this is essentially a predecessor to the Reflex IX-1, I'm not sure why the reviews are so different. This one has a 1/10 in rate of fire, while the Reflex (same blaster but one less dart and with tactical rail), has a 3/10. The capacity of the Reflex has a 3/10 with one dart, and this has a 4/10 with two darts. The Reflex has a 10/10 in range and accuracy, while this one, despite being essentially the same exact thing, has much lower scores. I'm wondering why, despite being very similar to the Reflex, this one has much lower scores. If the blaster really does fire less accurate and far, and has a worse rate, is there any reviews or video testing footage to prove these claims?

I think the conception of this one being weaker is on quite a few sites, but do we actually know if it's true? I imagine it has extremely similar internals, so I'm not sure of the huge difference in the ratings. GA GE  20:18, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Guess it's just weaker in range and less accurate really. Fixed the ROF and capacity though slightly.

Ninja of Nerf (talk) 07:01, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Guess being the key word, do we even know if there is a performance difference? ~GG360