Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-8975323-20130506224820/@comment-10906810-20131102214336

Vielle wrote: Iamheretoplease wrote: Vielle wrote: Iamheretoplease wrote: Vielle wrote: THE MAGSTRIKE GUY wrote:
 * Low range (25 feet-flat), pathetic for the Longshot's "successor".


 * It cannot hold drums on the stock like the Longshot.


 * Somewhat low rate of fire (for a blaster of its size). No, it is not a godamn sniper rifle, no excuse for a low rate of fire!


 * The "barrel" extension may be wide, but it is very long, so there's alot of barrel drag when using it.


 * Same internals as the recon, but in an unneccesarily big shell.

Who said it was the Longshot's "successor"?
 * It is a pathetic replacement for the Longshot, still better that the Centurion tho.

It's not a replacement for the longshot. Um, yes it is, dumbass. What are you, brain-dead? Provide me "EVIDENCE" from "REAL SOURCES" not your ignorant brain to proove the longstrike as the longshot's "Successor" People were able to piece together that the the longstrike is the longshot's successor because:

A- It's a sniper rifle, like the longshot

B- It has the same "motto" as the longshot

C- IT FEATURED A BOLT-ACTION PRIMING SYSTEM, JUST LIKE THE FUCKING LONGSHOT!!!!

It isn't a sniper. Do you see a damn scope or anything on the box that says SNIPER?

Nerf uses the same motto for almost everything.

So you're saying the Centurion is a successor to the longstrike? You're completely fucked up in the head. 1. advertised as a nerf SNIPER. Read that sentence over and over again in your tiny little, tiny little brain.

2. Name one. Now.

3. Where in this argument did anyone even MENTION the centurion? plus, the centurion is the spirtual successor to BOTH the longshot and longstrike.