Board Thread:Wiki news and announcements/@comment-5578690-20140527011025/@comment-5578690-20140527030658

Morshu.com wrote: MMMMMM, we already had this discussion. Not to mention, if there was an improvement drive, then there are wayyyy more articles that need improvement over just vintage blasters.

Some blasters that you mentioned don't even have very much more to add. Hell, let's add a bunch of content to unreleased/unreviewed blasters guys, because there's totally more info to add on those pages. last time I checked, there are not that many rare vintage compared to regular vintage that don't have nearly everything avaliable. not like these rare blasters don't exist somewhere, we have seen the venom shot and others online. its not like we don't have images of those. i'm not trying to start any pointless arguments here, these are the ones that are more lacking in terms of content than others and i do understand that more of you simply "don't care".

and since you are so informative on what article(s) needs improvement, why don't you list those as well?

while you're here, mind explaining what you're point of working on NEW is? it was already dead for a couple months and there doesn't really seem to be a point on top of you yelling at NSA.