Board Thread:General Nerf discussion/@comment-10394435-20130831164029/@comment-9548289-20140618101902

Throws-Many-Darts wrote: Oasegenggam wrote:

Throws-Many-Darts wrote:

Oasegenggam wrote: So what? This thread is made for fun, your gun is also crap. And what's so fun about trying to place yourself over others? What's so fun about belittling others' work to make yourself more confident about your own? That isn't fun at all. And please, instead of just saying my gun is crap, explain to me why. It's just fun, trying to beat other is just, fun.

Why? Why would it need an accel trigger unless it's flywheel, How can one gun have 3 stocks, why does it have 2 barrels? There's a lot of flaws in your gun. Hell there's an accel trigger and a pump action mech. There's a fine line between competition and being a pompous brat.

To answer your questions, the stocks and barrels are supposed to be one combined part. Since there were no stocks like what I wanted available to BaB, I had to improvise and combine a Retal and Praxis stock. The Retal barrel is meant to be a shroud, while the Longstrike extension is the actual barrel. And the front isn't a pump action mech- look at the other two versions of it, the "pump" gets replaced by a foregrip and a taclight, which indicates that it isn't used to operate the blaster in any way.

A part's RL function doesn't matter on BaB because they can be used for other things, too- look at Destroyer334545's work, he uses a Retaliator stock as an impromptu EOTech.

I'm guessing that since all your problems are functional, which as I've said before is not important, you have no complaints about appearance? Your gun is still nonsense. Yeah, I've seen destroyer's work, the Retal stock is utter nonsense. My problem is that you started it. I said something to someone, then you replied. And you're taking this to serious, this thread is made for fun, the sole purpose of this thread is to show your blaster and put details, not bashing other people's creations.